User talk:Josve05a

This is a Wikimedia Commons user talk page.

This is not an article, file or the talk page of an article or file. If you find this page on any site other than the Wikimedia Commons you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user to whom this talk page belongs may have no personal affiliation with any site other than the Wikimedia Commons itself. The original page is located at http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Josve05a.

This is the user talk page of Josve05a, where you can send messages and comments to Josve05a.

Archives 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 11, 12, 13, 14, 15

• Please sign and date your entries by clicking on the appropriate button or by typing four tildes (~~~~) at the end.
• Put new text under old text.
• New to Wikimedia Commons? Welcome! Ask questions, get answers as soon as possible.
• Click here to start a new topic.

	SpBot archives all sections tagged with {{Section resolved|1=~~~~}} after 1 day. The latest archive is located at Archive 15.

DR close

No offense but you should have left it someone else considering the multiple disagreements we have gotten in over the subject, including that file and the uploader of it. There's absolutely no reason what-so-ever that it can't be left to another admin. It comes off as POV involved editing when you got in a disagreement about it with me, wrote the pro AI generated image thing on your talk page, and then go around closing the exact same DRs that we got in the disagreement about as keep. Just leave them alone and let another admin close them. Its not that hard to not do involved editing. --Adamant1 (talk) 20:56, 22 July 2025 (UTC)

Having an opinion on copyright law is not involved editing. Stating that on my user page that COM:INUSE equals in scope is not involved editing. As stated in my recent edit summary: If another admin disagrees with the closure, they can re-open - the closure is an admin action. Feel free to take me to AN if you feel it was inappropriate. This was open for more than 3 months without closure. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 21:08, 22 July 2025 (UTC)

That's not all you did. Your being disingenuous about it. You got in an argument with me about these specific files and the uploader multiple times and then advocated for me to be indefed over it. That's not just "having an opinion on copyright." I can't take you ANI because I'm topic banned. Otherwise I probably would. I think a reasonable middle ground here since I agree that it's been open for a while is you posting a close request on the admin board. That's usually how people deal with DRs they want to be closed. Is there a reason you can't just do that instead? --Adamant1 (talk) 21:12, 22 July 2025 (UTC)

Just for what it's worth, IMO a quite harmful precedent for an issue we're only going to see more of. Effectively legitimizes any "dear chatgpt, create a new version of [copyrighted work] that 'isn't copyrighted' because it 'only copies the ideas' [but which we'll use specifically to represent that copyrighted work]". — Rhododendrites ^talk |  22:18, 22 July 2025 (UTC)

I agree this is likely something we’ll be seeing more of, and that's exactly why we need to assess each case individually. Some AI-generated works may indeed cross the line into copyright violation, but others may not, depending on how much protectable expression is actually carried over. A blanket approach either way would be unhelpful. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 22:24, 22 July 2025 (UTC)

File:Far Eastern Air Transport (FAT) Boeing 737-222 B-2603 at Hualien Airport (HUN) on 18 July 1980.jpg

Author of this image is Henk Geerlings. However, the permission ticket sent by Martijn Geerlings, as the author passed away, and Martijn is his son, on behalf of the original author, sent ticket email to add permission. Tô Ngọc Khang (talk) 03:42, 30 July 2025 (UTC)

Hi! Responses sent to VRT is awaiting review by another agent. Currently there's a slight backlog. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 21:34, 31 July 2025 (UTC)

Request undeletion

Hello. I hope you're having a good day. Could you please explain why this file was deleted as "consensus is to delete" [1]? I don't think this discussion had consensus to delete.

Also I tried to upload a new version of this collage like you suggested [2], but I had an overwriting not allowed issue. Though if the "File:Ասկերանի և Վանք գյուղի նկարներ 33.jpg" gets restored, there would be no reason for the collage to change. Hopefully you can restore it as I don't think there was consensus to delete. Thanks. KhndzorUtogh (talk) 14:39, 31 July 2025 (UTC)

You're right that "consensus to delete" may have been a poor choice of words. What I meant was that the file was deleted due to a consensus of relevant policies and legal texts, particularly COM:FOP Azerbaijan and the lack of evidence for commercial FOP under Artsakh law, not because of a clear consensus among participants. The DR had been open for over a month - if you disagree with the outcome, you're welcome to request review at COM:UNDEL. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 21:42, 31 July 2025 (UTC)

I had the time today to post the undeletion request. Thank you for your help. In the meantime, please don’t close the collage discussion yet. I won’t upload a new collage either until the undeletion request concludes. KhndzorUtogh (talk) 18:21, 1 August 2025 (UTC)

Given the fact that I opened the DR, I won't also close it (that would be "involved"). However, any other admin might do it 7 days after the opening of the request. You may wish to comment in that discussion regarding this. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 19:36, 1 August 2025 (UTC)

File:! (The Dismemberment Plan album).jpg

File:! (The Dismemberment Plan album).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

ChemSim (talk) 17:42, 3 August 2025 (UTC)