Wikimedia Commons

Commons:Featured picture candidates

Shortcut
This project page in other languages:

Other featured candidates

   📽️ Media

Skip to current candidates Skip to current candidates

Featured picture candidates

Featured picture candidates are images that the community will vote on, to determine whether or not they will be highlighted as some of the finest on Commons. This page lists the candidates to become featured pictures. The picture of the day images are selected from featured pictures.

Old candidates for Featured pictures are listed here. There are also chronological lists of featured pictures: 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023, 2024, 2025 and current month.

For another overview of our finest pictures, take a look at our annual picture of the year election.

Formal things

Nominating

Guidelines for nominators

Please read the complete guidelines before nominating.

This is a summary of what to look for when submitting and reviewing FP candidates:

  • Licensing – Images licensed with solely "GFDL" or "GFDL and an NC-only license" are not acceptable due the restrictions placed on re-use by these licenses.
  • Resolution – Raster images of lower resolution than 2 million pixels (pixels, not bytes) are typically rejected unless there are strong mitigating reasons. This does not apply to vector graphics (SVGs).
    • Graphics on Commons are not only viewed on conventional computer screens. They may be used in high-resolution print versions, and the images may be cropped to focus on portions of the image. See Commons:Why we need high resolution media for more information.
  • Scans – While not official policy, Help:Scanning provides advice on the preparation of various types of images that may be useful.
  • General quality – pictures being nominated should be of high technical quality.
  • Digital manipulations must not deceive the viewer. Digital manipulation for the purpose of correcting flaws in an image is generally acceptable, provided it is limited, well-done, and not intended to deceive.
    • For photographs, typical acceptable manipulations include cropping, perspective correction, sharpening/blurring, and color/exposure correction. More extensive manipulations, such as removal of distracting background elements, should be clearly described in the image text, by means of the {{Retouched picture}} template. Undescribed or mis-described manipulations which cause the main subject to be misrepresented are never acceptable. For images made from more than one photo, you can use the {{Panorama}} or {{Focus stacked image}} templates.
    • For historic images, acceptable manipulations might include digitally fixing rips, removal of stains, cleanup of dirt, and, for mass-produced artworks such as engravings, removal of flaws inherent to the particular reproduction, such as over-inking. Careful color adjustments may be used to bring out the original work from the signs of ageing, though care should be taken to restore a natural appearance. The original artistic intent should be considered when deciding whether it is appropriate to make a change. Edits to historic material should be documented in detail within the file description, and an unedited version should be uploaded and cross linked for comparison.
  • Value – our main goal is to feature most valuable pictures from all others. Pictures should be in some way special, so please be aware that:
    • almost all sunsets are aesthetically pleasing, and most such pictures are not in essence different from others,
    • night-shots are pretty but normally more details can be shown on pictures taken at daytime,
    • beautiful does not always mean valuable.
Artworks, illustrations, and historical documents

There are many different types of non-photographic media, including engravings, watercolors, paintings, etchings, and various others. Hence, it is difficult to set hard-and-fast guidelines. However, generally speaking, works can be divided into three types: Those that can be scanned, those that must be photographed, and those specifically created to illustrate a subject.

Works that must be photographed include most paintings, sculptures, works too delicate or too unique to allow them to be put on a scanner, and so on. For these, the requirements for photography, below, may be mostly followed; however, it should be noted that photographs which cut off part of the original painting are generally not considered featurable.

Works that may be scanned include most works created by processes that allow for mass distribution − for instance, illustrations published with novels. For these, it is generally accepted that a certain amount of extra manipulation is permissible to remove flaws inherent to one copy of the work, since the particular copy – of which hundreds, or even thousands of copies also exist – is not so important as the work itself.

Works created to serve a purpose include diagrams, scientific illustrations, and demonstrations of contemporary artistic styles. For these, the main requirement is that they serve their purpose well.

Provided the reproduction is of high quality, an artwork generally only needs one of the following four things to be featurable:

  • Notable in its own right: Works by major artists, or works that are otherwise notable, such as the subjects of a controversy.
  • Of high artistic merit: Works which, while not particularly well known, are nonetheless wonderful examples of their particular type or school of art.
  • Of high historic merit: The historical method values very early illustrations of scenes and events over later ones. Hence, a work of poor quality depicting a contemporaneous historical event can be nonetheless important, even if the artistic merit is relatively low. Likewise, scans or photographs of important documents – which may not be at all artistic – nonetheless may be highly valuable if the documents are historically significant. The reason for the image's historical importance should be briefly stated in the nomination, for those reviewers unfamiliar with the subject.
  • Of high illustrative merit: Works that illustrate or help explain notable subjects, for instance, illustrations of books, scientific subjects, or technical processes. The amount of artistic merit required for these will vary by subject, but, for instance, an illustration that makes the working of a complicated piece of machinery very clear need not be notable as a piece of artwork as well, whereas an illustration for a book might well be expected to reach much higher artistic standards.

Digital restorations must also be well documented. An unedited version of the image should be uploaded locally, when possible, and cross-linked from the file description page. Edit notes should be specified in detail, such as "Rotated and cropped. Dirt, scratches, and stains removed. Histogram adjusted and colors balanced."

Photographs

On the technical side, we have focus, exposure, composition, movement control and depth of field.

  • Focus – every important object in the picture should normally be sharp.
  • Exposure refers to the shutter diaphragm combination that renders an image with a tonal curve that ideally is able to represent in acceptable detail shadows and highlights within the image. This is called latitude. Images can be on the low side of the tonal curve (low range), the middle (middle range) or high side (upper range). Lack of shadow detail is not necessarily a negative characteristic. In fact, it can be part of the desired effect. Burned highlights in large areas are a distracting element.
  • Composition refers to the arrangement of the elements within the image. The "Rule of thirds" is one useful guideline. Horizons should almost never be placed in the middle, where they "cut" the image in half. Often, a horizon creating a top or bottom third of the space works better. The main idea is to use space to create a dynamic image.
    • Foreground and background – foreground and background objects may be distracting. You should check that something in front of the subject doesn't hide important elements and that something in background doesn't spoil the composition (for example that the streetlight doesn't "stand" on someone's head).
  • Movement control refers to the manner in which motion is represented in the image. Motion can be frozen or blurred. Neither one is better than the other. It is the intention of representation. Movement is relative within the objects of the image. For example, photographing a race car that appears frozen in relation to the background does not give us a sense of speed or motion, so technique dictates to represent the car in a frozen manner but with a blurred background, thus creating the sense of motion, this is called "panning". On the other hand, representing a basketball player in a high jump frozen in relation to everything else, due to the "unnatural" nature of the pose would be a good photograph.
  • Depth of field (DOF) refers to the area in focus in front of and beyond main subject. Depth of field is chosen according to the specific needs of every picture. Large or small DOF can either way add or subtract to the quality of the image. Low depth of field can be used to bring attention to the main subject, separating it from the general environment. High depth of field can be used to emphasize space. Short focal length lenses (wide angles) yield large DOF, and vice versa, long focal lenses (telephotos) have shallow DOF. Small apertures yield large DOF and conversely, large apertures yield shallow DOF.

On the graphic elements we have shape, volume, color, texture, perspective, balance, proportion, noise, etc.

  • Shape refers to the contour of the main subjects.
  • Volume refers to the three dimensional quality of the object. This is accomplished using side light. Contrary to general belief, front lighting is not the best light. It tends to flatten subject. Best light of day is early morning or late afternoon.
  • Color is important. Oversaturated colors are not good.
  • Texture refers to the quality of the surface of the subject. It is enhanced by side lighting… it is the "feel" to the touch.
  • Perspective refers to the "angle" accompanied by lines that disappear into a vanishing point that may or may not be inside the image.
  • Balance refers to the arrangement of subjects within the image that can either give equal weight or appear to be heavier on one side.
  • Proportion refers to the relation of size of objects in picture. Generally, we tend to represent small objects small in relation to others, but a good technique is to represent small objects large contrary to natural size relationship. For example, a small flower is given preponderance over a large mountain…. This is called inversion of scales.
Not all elements must be present. Some photographs can be judged on individual characteristics, that is, an image can be about color or texture, or color AND texture, etc.
  • Noise refers to unwanted corruption of color brightness and quality and can be caused by underexposure. It is not a desirable quality and can be grounds for opposition.
  • Symbolic meaning or relevance … Opinion wars can begin here … A bad picture of a very difficult subject is better than a good picture of an ordinary subject. A good picture of a difficult subject is an extraordinary photograph.
Images can be culturally biased by the photographer and/or the observer. The meaning of the image should be judged according to the cultural context of the image, not by the cultural context of the observer. An image "speaks" to people, and it has the capacity to evoke emotion such as tenderness, rage, rejection, happiness, sadness, etc. Good photographs are not limited to evoking pleasant sensations …

You will maximise the chances of your nominations succeeding if you read the complete guidelines before nominating.

Video and audio

Please nominate videos, sounds, music, etc. at Commons:Featured media candidates.

Set nominations

If a group of images are thematically connected in a direct and obvious way, they can be nominated together as a set. A set should fall under one of the following types:

  • Faithful digital reproductions of works notable in their own right, which the original author clearly intended to be viewed as a set. Examples: pages in a pamphlet, crops (puzzle pieces) of a prohibitively large scan, a pair of pendant paintings. Not acceptable: Arbitrary selection of sample works by an artist.
  • A sequence of images showing the passage of time. They could depict frames of a moving/changing object or a static object during different times of day or different seasons. Examples: diagrams illustrating a process, steps of a dance, metamorphosis of an insect, maps/drawings/photos of the same subject over the years (frame of view should be more or less the same).
  • A group of images depicting the same subject from different viewpoints, preferably taken under the same lighting conditions when possible. Examples: Exterior and interior of a building, different facades of a building, different interior views, obverse and inverse of a banknote/coin. Not acceptable: A selection of different rooms in a skyscraper, the facade of a church plus an organ, any images of fundamentally different scopes.
  • A group of images which show all possible variations of a particular class of object. Examples: Male and female versions of an animal (preferably in the same setting), all known species of a genus. Not acceptable: A few breeds of cats (unless they share a defining characteristic and represent all possible examples of that).

Simple tutorial for new users

Tutorial: Nominate on COM:FPC
How to nominate in 8 simple steps

STEP 1


STEP 2


STEP 3


STEP 4


STEP 5


STEP 6


STEP 7


STEP 8

NOTE: You don't need to worry if you are not sure, other users will try their best to help you.

Adding a new nomination

If you believe that you have found or created an image that could be considered valuable, with appropriate name, quality, image description, categories and licensing, then do the following.

Step 1: copy the image name into this box, after the text already present in the box, for example, Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Your image filename.jpg. Then click on the "create new nomination" button.

All single files:

For renominations, simply add /2 after the filename. For example, Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Foo.jpg/2

All set nomination pages should begin "Commons:Featured picture candidates/Set/", e.g. "Commons:Featured picture candidates/Set/My Nomination".


Step 2: follow the instructions on the page that you are taken to, and save that page.

Step 3: manually insert a link to the created page at the top of Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list: Click here, and add the following line to the TOP of the nominations list:

{{Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Your image filename.jpg}}

Galleries and FP categories: Please add a gallery page and section heading from the list at Commons FP galleries. Write the code as Page name#Section heading. For example: Commons:Featured pictures/Sports#Individual sports An image will only appear ONE time in the galleries. After a successful nomination, the image can be placed in several of the Featured pictures categories.

Optional: if you are not the creator of the image, please notify them using {{subst:FPC-notice|Your image filename.jpg}} -- ~~~~.

Note: Do not add an 'Alternative' image when you create a nomination. Selecting the best image is part of the nomination process. Alternatives are for a different crop or post-processing of the original image, or a closely related image from the same photo session (limited to 1 per nomination), if they are suggested by voters.

Voting

Editors whose accounts have at least 10 days and 50 edits can vote. Everybody can vote for their own nominations. Anonymous (IP) votes are not allowed.

You may use the following templates:

  • {{Support}} ( Support),
  • {{Oppose}} ( Oppose),
  • {{Neutral}} ( Neutral),
  • {{Comment}} ( Comment),
  • {{Info}} ( Info),
  • {{Question}} ( Question),
  • {{Request}} ( Request).

You may indicate that the image has no chance of success with the template {{FPX|reason - ~~~~}}, where reason explains why the image is clearly unacceptable as a FP. The template can only be used when there are no support votes other than the one from the nominator.

A well-written review helps participants (photographers, nominators and reviewers) improve their skills by providing insight into the strengths and weaknesses of a picture. Explain your reasoning, especially when opposing a candidate (which has been carefully selected by the author/nominator). English is the most widely understood language on Commons, but any language may be used in your review. A helpful review will often reference one or more of the criteria listed above.

Unhelpful reasons for opposing include:

  • No reason
  • "I don't like it" and other empty assessments
  • "You can do better" and other criticisms of the author/nominator rather than the image

Remember also to put your signature (~~~~).

Over time, featured picture standards change. It may be decided that for some pictures which were formerly "good enough", this is no longer the case. This is for listing an image which you believe no longer deserves to be a featured picture. For these, vote:

Text to use Displays as Meaning
{{Keep}}  Keep It deserves to remain a featured picture.
{{Delist}}  Delist It does not deserve to be a featured picture anymore.

This can also be used for cases in which a previous version of an image was promoted to FP, but a newer version of the image has been made and is believed to be superior to the old version, e.g. a newly edited version of a photo or a new scan of a historical image. In particular, it is not intended for replacing older photos of a particular subject with newer photos of the same subject, or in any other case where the current FP and the proposed replacement are essentially different images. For these nominations, vote:

Text to use Displays as Meaning
{{Keep}}  Keep Do not replace the old image with the new image as a FP.
{{Delistandreplace}}  Delist and replace Replace the current FP with the proposed replacement.

If you believe that some picture no longer meets the criteria for FP, you can nominate it for delisting, copying the image name into this box, after the text already present in the box:


In the new delisting nomination page just created you should include:

  • Information on the origin of the image (creator, uploader);
  • A link to the original FP nomination (it will appear under "Links" on the image description page);
  • Your reasons for nominating the image and your username.

After that, you have to manually insert a link to the created page at the top of Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list.

As a courtesy, leave an informative note on the talk page(s) of the original creator, uploader(s), and nominator with a link to the delisting candidate. {{subst:FPC-notice-removal}} can be used for this purpose.

General rules

  1. The voting period is 9 complete days counted from the nomination. After the end of this period the result will be determined. Votes added on day 10 and after are not counted.
  2. Nominations by anonymous contributors are welcome.
  3. Contributions to discussion by anonymous contributors are welcome.
  4. Only registered contributors whose Commons accounts have at least 10 days and 50 edits can vote. Exception: registered users can always vote in their own nominations no matter the account age and number of edits.
  5. Nominations do not count as votes. Support must be explicitly stated.
  6. Nominators and authors can withdraw their nominated pictures at any time. This is done by adding the following template: {{Withdraw}} ~~~~. Also, remember that if more than one version is nominated, you should explicitly state which version you are withdrawing.
  7. Remember, the goal of the Wikimedia Commons project is to provide a central repository for free images to be used by all Wikimedia projects, including possible future projects. This is not simply a repository for Wikipedia images, so images should not be judged here on their suitability for that project.
  8. Rules of the 5th day based on vote counts on day number 5 (day of nomination + 5):
    1. Pictures are speedy declined if they have fewer than two support votes.
    2. Pictures are speedy promoted if they have 10 support votes or more and no oppose votes. (Note that if it takes more than five days to reach this threshold, the picture can be promoted as soon as it is reached.) This does not apply to nominations containing at least one ‘Alternative’ image – because it is possible that another image can overtake the one in the lead during the last days, such nominations are never closed early.
    3. Once either speedy criterion is reached, the voting period is considered closed, and no more votes may be added.
  9. Pictures tagged {{FPX}} may be removed from the list 24 hours after the tag was applied, provided there are no support votes other than that of the nominator.
  10. Pictures tagged {{FPD}} (FP-Denied) may be removed from the list 24 hours after the tag was applied.
  11. Only two active nominations by the same user (that is, nominations under review and not yet closed) are allowed. The main purpose of this measure is to contribute to a better average quality of nominations, by driving nominators/creators to choose carefully the pictures presented to the forum.

Featuring and delisting rules

A candidate will become a featured picture in compliance with following conditions:

  1. Appropriate license (of course)
  2. At least seven  Support votes (or 7  Delist votes for a delist) at the end of nine days
  3. Ratio of supporting/opposing votes at least 2/1 (a two-thirds majority); same for delist/keep votes
  4. Two different versions of the same picture cannot both be featured, but only the one with higher level of support, as determined by the closer. Whenever the closer is not sure which version has consensus to be featured, they should attempt to contact the voters to clarify their opinions if not clear from the nomination page.
  5. Only two active delisting nominations per user, which is in addition to the limit of two active regular nominations.

The delisting rules are the same as those for FPs, with voting taking place over the same time period. The rule of the 5th day is applied to delisting candidates that have received no votes to delist, other than that of the proposer, by day 5.

The FPCBot handles the vote counting and closing in most cases, current exceptions are candidates containing multiple versions of the image as well as FPXed and withdrawn nominations. Any experienced user may close the requests not handled by the bot. For instructions on how to close nominations, see Commons:Featured picture candidates/What to do after voting is finished. Also note that there is a manual review stage between when the bot has counted the votes and before the nomination is finally closed by the bot; this manual review can be done by any user familiar with the voting rules.

Above all, be polite

Please don't forget that the image you are judging is somebody's work. Avoid using phrases like "it looks terrible" and "I hate it". If you must oppose, please do so with consideration. Also remember that your command of English might not be the same as someone else's. Choose your words with care.

Happy judging… and remember… all rules can be broken.

See also

Table of contents

List may contain works considered Not Safe for Work (nudity).

Nominators are requested, out of courtesy, to include the {{Nsfw}} template with such images. Users may select the gadget in user preferences "Deferred display of images tagged with {{Nsfw}} on COM:FPC" to enable the template's effect of hiding the image until selected.

Refresh page for new nominations: purge this page's cache
Shortcut

File:200 anos do Senado Federal (53454234104).jpg

Voting period ends on 13 Aug 2025 at 21:04:09 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

 

File:20181125 Alopochen aegyptiacus Saarland 01.jpg

Voting period ends on 13 Aug 2025 at 18:29:53 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

 

File:Chopa (Spondyliosoma cantharus) con un parásito (Anilocra physodes), Parque natural de la Arrábida, Portugal, 2022-07-29, DD 36.jpg

Voting period ends on 13 Aug 2025 at 17:10:01 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

 

File:Common hop on former factory wall, Ursus (Warsaw), 2024-07-20.jpg

Voting period ends on 13 Aug 2025 at 12:55:42 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

 

File:Pastellkreide -- 2025 -- 8665.jpg

Voting period ends on 13 Aug 2025 at 11:43:58 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

 

File:Aerial view of Portuguese calçada, Instituto Superior Técnico, Lisbon, Portugal julesvernex2.jpg

Voting period ends on 13 Aug 2025 at 10:27:41 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

 

File:Schwalbenschwanz (Papilio machaon) Raupe-20250724-RM-101941.jpg

Voting period ends on 13 Aug 2025 at 10:27:10 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

 

File:Official Presidential Portrait of President Donald J. Trump (2025).jpg

Voting period ends on 13 Aug 2025 at 06:30:59 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

 

  Agree Vitor Hello? 00:03, 5 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:The Christian Martyrs' Last Prayer GA&C.jpg

Voting period ends on 13 Aug 2025 at 01:50:42 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

 

File:20230317 Laeiszhalle.jpg

Voting period ends on 12 Aug 2025 at 20:00:24 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

 

File:Baillon's Crake in Baruipur February 2024 by Tisha Mukherjee 03.jpg

Voting period ends on 12 Aug 2025 at 16:58:35 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

 

File:Yr Wyddfa towards Llyn Llydaw Crib Goch 2019 01.jpg

Voting period ends on 12 Aug 2025 at 16:58:37 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

 

File:The Earth seen from Apollo 17.jpg (delist and replace)

Voting period ends on 12 Aug 2025 at 16:48:38
   

File:Monreale Cathedral BW 2025-04-29 16-01-19 hdr.jpg

Voting period ends on 12 Aug 2025 at 16:35:52 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

 

File:Telus Sky (detail) from Calgary Tower, Calgary, Alberta, 2025-07-14.jpg

Voting period ends on 12 Aug 2025 at 14:44:01 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

 

File:Nilgiris Sholur Reflection Bokkapuram Sep22 R16 06402.jpg

Voting period ends on 12 Aug 2025 at 13:43:03 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

 

File:Iglesia de San Miguel Arcángel, Altea, Alicante, España, 2023-01-21, DD 48.jpg

Voting period ends on 12 Aug 2025 at 09:16:48 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

 
  • If you don’t mind, Poco a poco, I can take adopt the nomination to avoid all the hassle involved in renominating. AFAICR we have used this procedure before. I have taken the liberty to strike out and update the nomination notice. I hope this is OK. I have also changed the template to {{FPX contested}}, you just need to strike it out to invalidate the oppose vote. (Or maybe you can just comment out the template and replace it by a normal comment.) – Aristeas (talk) 18:32, 3 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Catalufa espejuelo (Priacanthus hamrur), Zanzíbar, Tanzania, 2024-05-31, DD 48.jpg

Voting period ends on 11 Aug 2025 at 19:59:33 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

 

File:Friedenspalast Den Haag.jpg

Voting period ends on 11 Aug 2025 at 19:41:23 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

 

*  Comment: the sky is full of noise and artefacts at full resolution. On the other hand, the 100 MP version is essentially flawless, and I'd be happy to support it. --The Cosmonaut (talk) 00:49, 3 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  •   Comment Well, the 100 megapixel version is just a downsized version of this one. So the version we are voting on is superior in every way. Penalising this one for being noisier at full size is like looking at the picture in a magnifying glass and complaining it doesn't look as good. Cmao20 (talk) 01:13, 3 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Stupa 1, Sanchi 02.jpg

Voting period ends on 11 Aug 2025 at 18:10:55 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

 

File:010 White-eared bulbul in Keoladeo National Park Photo by Giles Laurent.jpg

Voting period ends on 11 Aug 2025 at 08:58:36 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

 
  • Not at all. It is common sense. Some animals are more human-tolerant than others; some stay standing/perching/sitting/floating in one place longer than others; some are easy to find and so offer more photographic opportunites. Some are rare and can only be found in a few places. Some are nocturnal and are seldom seen during daylight. I could go on... Charlesjsharp (talk) 17:25, 2 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    You have misconstrued my comment. What I meant to say was that I don't understand why voters use the "This is a common and easy species to photograph" as a rationale for their opposition. Wolverine X-eye 18:26, 2 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    The rationale is that if it is easy to photograph, then it is easy to photograph in a near-perfect or highly satisfactory way—because the ease allows as many retakes as one wishes. Which, imo, is a perfectly valid rationale for opposition. E.g. a house cat, a pet, would be easy to photograph but an Asiatic lion in the wild can only be photographed in a very small area of the world, depending on luck (of encounter) in that area, and from a safe distance in case of encounter, and even then depending on the lion's mood. I would be willing to overlook imperfections in a picture of a rare subject, but not so much in a picture of subjects that are frequently photographed, easy to access, easily available etc. UnpetitproleX (Talk) 20:28, 2 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  •   Support Excellent and beautiful photo. Tagooty and Charles refer to what seems to be common sense among naturalists and nature photographers; from the general view of photography, one can argue differently. Weston has demonstrated that excellent photos of everyday stuff are more important as photographs than mediocre photos of rare things, and at least since Weston’s time many textbooks on photography (e.g., Feininger’s classic books) teach the same. E.g., Weston’s pepper photos are certainly much better photographs than tourist snapshots of the Eiffel tower or of the Mona Lisa, although peppers are common and the Eiffel tower and the Mona Lisa are unique. So for the importance of a photo as a photo, the rarity of the subject is much less important than the technical quality, the creativity, and the expressive power of the photograph. I respect the naturalistic view on nature photographs, but reserve the right to assess FP candidates also from the point of view of photography; IMHO we should consider both perspectives here. – Aristeas (talk) 18:35, 2 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Blue-throated Blue Flycatcher, Thattekad, Vimal Rajyaguru, 01.jpg

Voting period ends on 11 Aug 2025 at 05:19:10 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

 

File:House sparrow mother and chicks (30608).jpg

Voting period ends on 11 Aug 2025 at 02:04:17 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

 

File:Puits Rodolphe 01.jpg

Voting period ends on 10 Aug 2025 at 10:02:11 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

 
  •   Neutral Sorry, but IMHO the composition of the expanded version with all the stuff at the left is a step back; IMHO it’s a very interesting photo, but not a good composition anymore. I am really very sorry for this, I know it feels unfair, but I have to be honest here. – Aristeas (talk) 18:39, 2 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not sure about all verticals, but I think the current version is clearly better. --Milseburg (talk) 11:23, 4 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Thanks for your thoughtful decision. The original, non-extended version works well too and addresses the concerns. -- Radomianin (talk) 06:21, 4 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Thank you! Ich weiß, es ist oft schwer/unmöglich, es allen recht zu machen! ;–) Aber ich denke, Deine ursprüngliche Intuition war schon richtig: die Konzentration auf den Teil mit den beiden turmartigen Aufbauten ergibt eine spannungsreiche und zugleich geschlossene Komposition. – Aristeas (talk) 08:50, 4 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Peacock (Aglais io) caterpillar Ruggeller Riet.jpg

Voting period ends on 10 Aug 2025 at 08:42:26 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

 

File:Peacock (Aglais io) caterpillars on stinging nettle (Urtica dioica) Ruggeller Riet.jpg

Voting period ends on 10 Aug 2025 at 08:45:07 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

 

File:002 Asian green bee-eaters in Keoladeo National Park Photo by Giles Laurent.jpg

Voting period ends on 10 Aug 2025 at 07:54:44 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

 

File:Black alder twig and water ripples at Wolfsberger Mühle, 2019-06-29.jpg

Voting period ends on 10 Aug 2025 at 04:58:53 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

 

File:View of the glacier of Öræfajökull volcano in Hornafjörður municipality, Iceland, 20240719 1738 2793.jpg

Voting period ends on 10 Aug 2025 at 04:09:58 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

 

File:Moken Village1.jpg

Voting period ends on 10 Aug 2025 at 02:57:03 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

 

File:Familiar bluet (21468).jpg

Voting period ends on 10 Aug 2025 at 01:16:41 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

 

File:Asian Emerald Dove in Kuldiha Wildlife Sanctuary March 2025 by Tisha Mukherjee 02.jpg

Voting period ends on 9 Aug 2025 at 08:56:04 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

 

File:Camarasaurus supremus skull (TMP 1984.161.0008, detail), Royal Tyrrell Museum, Drumheller, Alberta, 2025-07-13 02.jpg

Voting period ends on 9 Aug 2025 at 01:01:54 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

 

File:Paul Schrader at the 2024 Toronto International Film Festival (cropped) 2.jpg

Voting period ends on 8 Aug 2025 at 18:18:41 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

 

Voting period ends on 8 Aug 2025 at 18:08:19 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

 
Confirmed results:
Result: 18 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 21:05, 4 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: People/Portrait#Women

File:Ashy-crowned Sparrow-Lark in Ajodhya Hills February 2024 by Tisha Mukherjee 02.jpg

Voting period ends on 8 Aug 2025 at 08:42:04 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

 

File:Elif Iman.jpg

Voting period ends on 8 Aug 2025 at 06:02:00 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

 
  •   Comment Agree with this, a well-taken and charming photo but it needs to be categorised and presented differently so that it feels more like a real contribution to a project with educational goals rather than a photo from a personal album. Cmao20 (talk) 12:19, 30 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Very   Weak support per Aristeas. UnpetitproleX (Talk) 18:25, 2 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  Oppose I do not believe this photo should be promoted unless some effort is put in to making the nomination valuable for the project. Cmao20 (talk) 12:48, 4 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Apollo 11 Lunar Lander - 5927 NASA.jpg (delist and replace)

Voting period ends on 7 Aug 2025 at 10:38:56
   

  •   Info Apollo 11 extravehicular activity (EVA): Buzz Aldrin removing the passive seismometer from a compartment in the SEQ bay of the Lunar Lander.
  •   Info Replace by a higher resolution and quality image (Original nomination)
  •   Delist and replace -- Yann (talk) 10:38, 29 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  •   Delist and replace  — Chris Woodrich (talk) 10:53, 29 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  •   Weak delist and replace As a rule I'm generally not that in favour of scanning old pictures at a higher size because I question whether we're really recording any more useful information, rather than just adding file size. I feel this about a number of painting scans that have been nominated for D&R - no one needs a massive scan resolving the individual brushstrokes that no one's computer can actually load. One interesting question is how many pixels does it take to describe the usable detail we actually get from the Hasselblad cameras they used on the Moon. The question of what is a film camera's native resolution doesn't really apply as it would with a digital camera (see here ) but it is still worth considering what would be the ideal tradeoff between fine detail and file size.
That said, the original here was only 5.5 megapixels, so there is surely room for improvement. Additionally, it cuts off the antenna at the top - again, this is an improvement in the new version. On the flipside, this one seems a bit too light, and some details are overexposed. On balance, taking into account all these factors, I do think this is an improvement overall, but it is not clear cut. Edit: one thing I would ask is if the nominator could add all of the useful image notes on the original picture to the proposed replacement. They make this picture more valuable for the project and it would be a shame to lose them. Cmao20 (talk) 15:39, 29 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Cmao20: FYI, the overexposure of the highlight was already there in the PNG source. I have only increased the light in the middle range, and reduced the red overcast. According to the link you give above, 360 Mpx are needed to record all information from the 6x6 film used by Apollo missions. We are still far from that. Sure, I will copy the notes. Yann (talk) 16:03, 30 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Avian influenza roee shpernik 09.jpg

Voting period ends on 7 Aug 2025 at 02:02:31 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

 
  • A variety of opinions is to be welcomed, and it's what makes this process work. I think people should never be afraid to go against consensus, whether that is opposing an image with lots of supports or supporting one with several opposes. There are plenty of individual decisions I disagree with at FPC but I think overall, it probably averages out to a suitably high standard of pictures getting promoted. Cmao20 (talk) 15:51, 29 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Trier, 08-12-2023 (actm.) 25.jpg

Voting period ends on 6 Aug 2025 at 04:57:58 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

 

File:Unnamed island, Cheow Lan Lake1.jpg

Voting period ends on 5 Aug 2025 at 17:14:12 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

 

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 4 Aug 2025 at 19:08:48 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

 
Confirmed results:
Result: 4 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 21:08, 4 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]


Timetable (day 5 after nomination)

Thu 31 Jul → Tue 05 Aug
Fri 01 Aug → Wed 06 Aug
Sat 02 Aug → Thu 07 Aug
Sun 03 Aug → Fri 08 Aug
Mon 04 Aug → Sat 09 Aug
Tue 05 Aug → Sun 10 Aug

Timetable (day 9 after nomination, last day of voting)

Sun 27 Jul → Tue 05 Aug
Mon 28 Jul → Wed 06 Aug
Tue 29 Jul → Thu 07 Aug
Wed 30 Jul → Fri 08 Aug
Thu 31 Jul → Sat 09 Aug
Fri 01 Aug → Sun 10 Aug
Sat 02 Aug → Mon 11 Aug
Sun 03 Aug → Tue 12 Aug
Mon 04 Aug → Wed 13 Aug
Tue 05 Aug → Thu 14 Aug

The bot

Note that the description below is for manual closure, this is mostly not needed anymore as there exists a bot (FPCBot) that counts the votes and handles the process below. However after the bot has counted the votes a manual review step is used to make sure the count is correct before the bot again picks up the work.

Manual procedure

Any experienced user may close requests.

  1. In Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list click on the title/link of the candidate image, then [edit].
    Add the result of the voting at the bottom (on a new line with a space first)
    {{FPC-results-reviewed|support=x|oppose=x|neutral=x|featured=("yes" or "no")|gallery=xxx (leave blank if "featured=no")|sig=~~~~}}
     (for example see Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:The Bridge (August 2013).jpg). See also {{FPC-results-reviewed}}.
  2. Also edit the title of the candidate image template and add after the image tag featured or not featured – for example:
    === [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]] ===
    becomes
    === [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]], featured ===
  3. Save your edit.
  4. If it is featured:
    • Add the picture to the list of the four most recently featured pictures of an appropriate gallery of Commons:Featured pictures, list as the first one and delete the last one, so that the number is four again.
    • Also add the picture to the appropriate gallery and section of Commons:Featured pictures, list. Click on the most appropriate link beneath where you just added it as one of the four images. An image should only appear ONE time in the galleries. After a successful nomination, the image can be placed in several of the Featured pictures categories.
    • Add the template {{Assessments|featured=1}} to the image description page.
      • If it was an alternative image or part of a set nomination, use the com-nom parameter. For example, if File:Foo.jpg was promoted at Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Bar.jpg, use {{Assessments|featured=1|com-nom=Bar.jpg}}
      • If the image is already featured on another Wikipedia, just add featured=1 to the Assessments template. For instance {{Assessments|enwiki=1}} becomes {{Assessments|enwiki=1|featured=1}}
    • Add the picture to the chronological list of featured pictures. Put it in the gallery using this format: File:xxxxx.jpg|# '''Headline'''<br>created by [[User:xxxxx|xxxxx]], uploaded by [[User:xxxxx|xxxxx]], nominated by [[User:xxxxx|xxxxx]]
      • The # should be replaced by 1 for the first image nominated that month, and counts up after that. Have a look at the other noms on that page for examples.
      • You may simplify this if multiple things were done by the same user. E.g.: File:xxxxx.jpg|# '''Headline'''<br>created, uploaded, and nominated by [[User:xxxxx|xxxxx]]
    • Add == FP promotion ==
      {{FPpromotion|File:XXXXX.jpg}} to the talk page of the nominator. For set nominations, use:
      == Set Promoted to FP ==
      <gallery>
      File:XXXXXX.jpg
      File:XXXXXX.jpg
      </gallery>
      {{FPpromotionSet2|YYYYY}}      , using the names of the set files instead of the XXXXXX and the title of the set instead of YYYYY.
    • Add == FP promotion ==
      {{FPpromotedUploader|File:XXXXX.jpg}} to the talk page of the user who has uploaded the image, if that user is not the same as the nominator.
    • Add == FP promotion ==
      {{FPpromotedCreator|File:XXXXX.jpg}} to the talk page of the creator, if the author is a different Commons user than nominator and uploader.
  5. As the last step (whether the image is featured or not; including {{FPX}}ed, {{FPD}}ed and withdrawn nominations), open Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list, click on [edit], and find the transclusion of the nomination you've just finished closing. It will be of the form:
    {{Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:XXXXX.jpg}}
    Copy it to the bottom of Commons:Featured picture candidates/Log/August 2025), save that page, and remove it from the candidate list.

Closing a delisting request

  1. In Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list click on the title/link of the candidate image, then [edit].
    Add the result of the voting at the bottom (on a new line with a space first)
    '''Result:''' x delist, x keep, x neutral => /not/ delisted. ~~~~
    (for example see Commons:Featured picture candidates/removal/Image:Astrolabe-Persian-18C.jpg)
  2. Also edit the title of the delisting candidate image template and add after the image tag
    delisted or not delisted
    For example:
    === [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]] === becomes === [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]], delisted ===
  3. Move the actual template from Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list to the bottom of the actual month page on Commons:Featured picture candidates/Log/August 2025.
  4. If the outcome was not delisted, stop here. If it is delisted:
    1. Remove the picture from Commons:Featured pictures, list and any subpages.
    2. Edit the picture's description as follows:
      1. Replace the template {{Featured picture}} on the image description page by {{Delisted picture}}. If using the {{Assessments}} template, change featured=1 to featured=2 (do not change anything related to its status in other featured picture processes).
      2. Remove the image from all categories beginning with "Featured [pictures]" (example: Featured night photography, Featured pictures from Wiki Loves Monuments 2016, Featured pictures of Paris).
      3. Remove the "Commons quality assessment" claim (d:Property:P6731) "Wikimedia Commons featured picture" from the picture's Structured data.
    3. Add a delisting-comment to the original entry in chronological list of featured pictures in bold-face, e. g. delisted 2007-07-19 (1-6) with (1-6) meaning 1 keep and 6 delist votes (change as appropriate). The picture in the gallery is not removed.
  5. If this is a Delist and Replace, the delisting and promotion must both be done manually. To do the promotion, follow the steps in the above section. Note that the assessment tag on the file page and the promotion tag on the nominator's talk page won't pick up the /replace subpage that these nominations use.

Manual archiving of a withdrawn nomination

  1. In Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list click on the title/link of the candidate image, then [edit].
    In the occasion that the FPCbot will not mark withdrawn nominations with a "to be reviewed" template and put them in Category:Featured picture candidates awaiting closure review just like if they were on the usual list, put the following "no" template:
    {{FPC-results-reviewed|support=X|oppose=X|neutral=X|featured=no|gallery=|sig=--~~~~}}
  2. Also edit the title of the candidate image template and add after the image tag
    not featured
    For example:
    === [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]] ===
    becomes
    === [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]], not featured ===
  3. Save your edit.
  4. Open Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list, click on [edit], and find the transclusion of the nomination. It will be of the form:
    {{Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:XXXXX.jpg}}
    Copy it to the bottom of Commons:Featured picture candidates/Log/August 2025), save that page, and remove it from the candidate list.
Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Featured_picture_candidates&oldid=1058811897"